After observing this, I turned again to Marx and Gandhi and discovered that they did not place any of these ideals at the center of their thinking. Marx explicitly regarded freedom and equality as bourgeois ideals. Gandhi, as you know, showed total indifference to these liberal conceptions and to the codes and institutions they should anchor. I think these sources of tension between freedom and equality have been at the heart of their rejection of both ideals, even if they have not formulated it as I did. And I think they were both looking for something more fundamental, much more human and even timeless than these ideals of enlightening modernity. You will have noticed that these two readings of Gandhi, which I call absurd, are made for the other. Both deny exactly what I call his “integrity,” with the latter opinion claiming that he is all and only a philosopher with no serious interest in politics, and the former claim that our interest in him lies solely in his political successes, not in his distant philosophy. The idea of “integrity” is therefore precisely intended to make it clear that these two points of view, in all their frank contrast, have a common underlying error, because they do not perceive what I call Gandhi`s “integrity”. 43. “The experiment will use a trio of spacecraft that will fly in formation in the form of a triangle of the same face, whose sides are a million kilometers long, with lasers between the spacecraft.” The experiment in question relates to (answer- C) 2.

A common convergence between Gandhism and Marxism is (answer A) But even if I leave aside these affinities with Marx, if I am right, that Gandhi thought that India was at the crossroads of Europe in early modern times and that he wanted to anticipate developments in political economy (and its harmful cognitive and social effects), What took place in the European modernity that followed is then an equally good comparison with other dissenting radical voices in early modern Europe. This is why I considered much of Gandhi`s thought as an intellectual alliance, not only with Marx, but also with pre-existing radical thinkers like Gerrard Winstanley in primitive modernity, who attempted to advance developments (in England, in his case) that he predicted as being of the enclosure and privatization of communes and the transformation of agricultural lifestyles, What we would call “agribusiness” today predicts prospectively. Capitalists should become the trustees of the country`s wealth and use their genius for the common good.